As part of the planning team for the RE Eastern Network, we spent quite some time last week talking about the place of dialogue in Religious Education. Our first discussion was about what constituted dialogue. We talked about what dialogue IS and what it IS NOT. This is what we came up with:
Dialogue IS: participatory, open, acknowledges difference, respectful, purposeful, seeks understanding and multiple perspectives
Dialogue IS NOT: prescriptive, closed, dominated by one person, casual, incidental conversation
We then participated in a ‘Guiding a Dialogue’ protocol where we considered some possibilities dialogue enables for the participants. There are a variety of ways to contribute to dialogue including:
- playing with ideas – possibility thinking
- affirming and building on others’ ideas
- following the ideas as far as you go – giving in to the ebb and flow of different directions
- making links with others’ ideas
- considering multiple perspectives or various viewpoints
- offering questions and paraphrasing as well as your own thinking
The protocol enabled us to practise our dialogical skills and challenged them also.
At Holy Spirit Community School, we have worked hard to embed collegial dialogue as an integral part of the planning process in Religious Education. All staff are encouraged to participate in this phase of the planning, not just classroom teachers. This brings diversity and richness to the discussion. We have found that staff enjoy grappling with the ‘big concepts’ central to our RE units at an adult level. The dialogue is often loud, enthusiastic and hard to wind up! Staff value the opportunity to sort out their own thinking and ask their own questions about the key concepts we are going to be working with. This stage of the planning also helps us to resist the urge to jump in with great activities and focus on developing deep understandings ourselves before we try and do that with our students.
Some of our staff have reflected on the value of collegial discussion in our RE planning. Here are their thoughts:
How is dialogue used in your school to improve student outcomes?